Are fish fingers ultra-processed?
A fillet in breadcrumbs can be group 3. Most are not.
Closer than most people expect. The fish itself is group 1, and a coating of flour, breadcrumb, oil and salt is group 2 material, so a fish finger made from a cut fillet in a plain crumb is group 3.
Two things usually move it
- The batter. Raising agents, stabilisers, colours and flavourings are common in the coating even where the fish is untouched: group 4.
- Reformed fish. Products made from minced or bound fish rather than a cut fillet generally carry stabilisers or phosphates: group 4.
The label distinguishes them more clearly than most categories. A product describing its contents as a fillet is a different thing from one describing minced or formed fish, and that wording is regulated rather than marketing.
Fish fingers went on sale in Britain in 1955 and were originally a way to use cheaper fish, which is a reasonable summary of the category ever since: the fish is rarely the expensive or the complicated part.
Working this out from a receipt is harder than from a packet, because a till prints about twenty characters of product name and no ingredients list. That is the problem Bagged exists to solve, and how a receipt is structured explains why it is the hard part.
Common questions
- Are breaded and battered different?
- Often. A plain breadcrumb coating can be group 3 material; a batter is more likely to carry raising agents and stabilisers, which are group 4 markers.
One photo of a receipt answers this for your own shopping.
Bagged reads every line and reports what share of your food spend was ultra-processed, and which items it was.
Get the app